Site icon Karenmillen Outlet

Predicting entrepreneurship from brain structure and neural responses to risk and ambiguity

Predicting entrepreneurship from brain structure and neural responses to risk and ambiguity
  • Van Praag, C. M. & Versloot, P. H. What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Bus. Econ. 29, 351–382 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Holan, P. M. It’s all in your head: Why we need neuroentrepreneurship. J. Manag. Inq. 23, 93–97 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries, definition of entrepreneur in English. Retrieved on 5.12.2023, from https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=entrepreneur.

  • Rauch, A. & Frese, M. Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 16(4), 353–385 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Nicolaou, N., Cherkas, L. & Spector, T. D. Do openness to experience and recognizing opportunities have the same genetic source?. Hum. Resour Manag.: Publ. Cooper. Sch. Bus. Admin. Univ. Michigan Alliance Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag. 49(2), 291–303 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, H. Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Pers. Individ. Differ. 51(3), 222–230 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R. & Xu, T. Personality traits of entrepreneurs: A review of recent literature. Found. Trends Entrep. 14(3), 279–356 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, X. The effect of personality traits on entrepreneurial development in Western China. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 57(5), 1284–1299 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. & Ruef, M. The myth of the risk-tolerant entrepreneur. Strateg. Organ. 2(4), 331–355 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, H. J., Opper, S. & Nee, V. Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: An economic experiment in China. Manag. Sci. 59(7), 1671–1687 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F. M. & Kritikos, A. S. Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs–new evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Bus. Econ. 32, 153–167 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., Herz, H., Nanda, R. & Weber, R. A. Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from behavioral economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 28, 49–70 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R. & Van Praag, M. Risk, uncertainty, and entrepreneurship: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Manag. Sci. 62(10), 2897–2915 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R. & Dalton, M. Risk attitudes and personality traits of entrepreneurs and venture team members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116(36), 17712–17716 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmony, F. U. & Kanbach, D. K. Changes in entrepreneurs’ risk-taking propensity across venture phases. J. Enterp. Cult. 30(01), 1–31 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. Risk, uncertainty and profit. (Hart, Schaffner & Marx, New York, NY, 1921).

  • Ellsberg, D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econ. 75, 643–669. (1961).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. & Brownson, F. What price ambiguity? or the role of ambiguity in decision-making. J. Polit. Econ. 72, 62–73 (1964).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. & Weber, M. W. Recent developments in modelling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 5, 325–370 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W. & Barney, J. B. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Ventur. 12, 9–30 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, H. Y. & Foo, S. L. Moderating effects of tolerance for ambiguity and risktaking propensity on the role conflict-perceived performance relationship: Evidence from Singaporean entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 12, 67–81 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H. Jr., Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C. & Carland, J. W. A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. J. Bus. Ventur. 14, 189–214 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 16, 359–376 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S. & Shepherd, D. A. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31, 132–152 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S. & Sarasvathy, S. D. Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Acad. Manag. Ann. 12, 659–687 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. & Hmieleski, K. M. The conflicting cognitions of corporate entrepreneurs. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31, 103–121 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. P. & Holland, D. V. Environmental effects on the cognitions of corporate and independent entrepreneurs. Small Bus. Econ. 45, 369–381 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A., Clark, L., Labuzetta, J., Sahakian, B. & Vyakarnum, S. The innovative brain. Nature 456, 168–169. (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Laureiro-Martínez, D. et al. Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration-exploitation task. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 927 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vantilborgh, T., Joly, J. & Pepermans, R. Explaining entrepreneurial status and success from personality: an individual-level application of the entrepreneurial orientation framework. Psychol. Belgica 55, 32 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Sun, S., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B. & Yu, R. Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t: Neural processing of risk and ambiguity. Neuroimage 236, 118109 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, S., Drover, W., Cerf, M. & Hmieleski, K. M. Using functional neuroimaging to advance entrepreneurial cognition research. J. Small Bus. Manag. 61, 938–966. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H. & Marschak, J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9, 226–232. (1964).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Konova, A. B., Louie, K. & Glimcher, P. W. The computational form of craving is a selective multiplication of economic value. PNAS 115, 4122–4127 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangemeister, L., Grabenhorst, F. & Schultz, W. Neural activity in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflecting the intention to save reward. Social Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 14, 1255–1261 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R. E. & Laffont, J. J. A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J. Polit. Econ. 87, 719–748 (1979).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. A. & Laury, S. K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 1644–1655 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, T. et al. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 9, 522–550 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R.J. Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B (1984). (University Microfilms No. 84–22112)

  • Williams, D. G. Neuroticism and extraversion in different factors of the affect intensity measure. Pers. Individ. Differ. 10, 1095–1100 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinfurt, K. P., Bryant, F. B. & Yarnold, P. R. The factor structure of the affect intensity measure: In search of a measurement model. J. Res. Pers. 28, 314–331 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. & Bridges, M. W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 1063–1087 (1994).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Voxel-based morphometry—The methods. Neuroimage 11, 805–821 (2000).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38, 95–113 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilaie-Dotan, S. et al. Neuroanatomy predicts individual risk attitudes. J. Neurosci. 34, 12394–12401 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, P. N., Biele, G. & Heekeren, H. R. Neural processing of risk. J. Neurosci. 30, 6613–6619 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, M., Anton, J. L., Valabregue, R., & Poline, J. B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Presented at the 8th International Conferance on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2–6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in NeuroImage, 16(2), abstract 497.

  • Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Turner, R. & Frackowiak, R. S. Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI. Neuroimage 2, 157–165 (1995).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T. & Kable, J. W. The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 76, 412–427 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan Pepe, M. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874. (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, A. & Chernozhukov, V. Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models. Bernoulli 19, 521–547 (2013).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, P. N., Christopoulos, G. I., O’Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J. & Schultz, W. Risk-dependent reward value signal in human prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 7185–7190 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica 60, 497–528 (1998).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W. et al. Explicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertainty. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 363(1511), 3801–3811 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardini, S., Cloninger, C. R. & Venneri, A. Individual differences in personality traits reflect structural variance in specific brain regions. Brain Res. Bull. 79, 265–270 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, R. & Rees, G. The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 12, 231–242 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydogan, G. et al. Genetic underpinnings of risky behaviour relate to altered neuroanatomy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 787–794 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M. & Rodríguez, D. Divergent thinking and post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes: non-linearities and the moderating role of experience. Small Bus. Econ. 62(4), 1523–1553 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morriss, J., Gell, M. & van Reekum, C. M. The uncertain brain: A co-ordinate based meta-analysis of the neural signatures supporting uncertainty during different contexts. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 96, 241–249. (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Teran, E., Diez, I. & Lopez-Pascual, J. An ALE meta-analysis on investment decision-making. Brain Sci. 11, 399 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigue, S., Grafton, S. T. & Bianchi-Demicheli, F. Correlation between insula activation and self-reported quality of orgasm in women. Neuroimage 37, 551–560. (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Häusler, A. N., Kuhnen, C. M., Rudorf, S. & Weber, B. Preferences and beliefs about financial risk taking mediate the association between anterior insula activation and self-reported real-life stock trading. Sci. Rep. 8, 11207. (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, C., Bode, S., Derntl, B. & Heekeren, H. R. The effect of strategies, goals and stimulus material on the neural mechanisms of emotion regulation: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 72, 111–128. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauda, F. et al. Meta-analytic clustering of the insular cortex: characterizing the meta-analytic connectivity of the insula when involved in active tasks. Neuroimage 62, 343–355 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, R., Tolmeijer, E., Wibroe, J., Peters, E. & Mason, L. Networks underpinning emotion: A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity. Neuroimage 243, 118486 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behav. Brain Sci. 35, 121–143. (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslik, E. C., Mueller, V. I., Eickhoff, C. R., Langner, R. & Eickhoff, S. B. Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 48, 22–34 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar-Szakacs, I. & Uddin, L. Q. Anterior insula as a gatekeeper of executive control. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 139, 104736 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, F. et al. Advancing (neuro) entrepreneurship cognition research through resting-state fMRI: A methodological brief. Entrepr. Theory Pract. 48, 719–741 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, T. et al. The role of the ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control. Brain 130, 1525–1537 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dheer, R. J. & Lenartowicz, T. Cognitive flexibility: Impact on entrepreneurial intentions. J. Vocat. Behav. 115, 103339 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamaszek, M. et al. Consensus paper: Cerebellum and emotion. Cerebellum 16, 552–576. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, M. R. et al. A missing link in affect regulation: the cerebellum. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 17, 1068–1081 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. E., Thomasson, M., Voruz, P., Selosse, G. & Péron, J. Explicit and implicit emotion processing in the cerebellum: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Cerebellum 22, 852–864. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmahmann, J. D., Guell, X., Stoodley, C. J. & Halko, M. A. The theory and neuroscience of cerebellar cognition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 337–364 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Hmieleski, K. M. & Henry, R. A. Entrepreneurs’ dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits–and potential costs–of being “up”. J. Bus. Ventur. 27, 310–324 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tata, A., Martinez, D. L., Garcia, D., Oesch, A. & Brusoni, S. The psycholinguistics of entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 7, 38–44 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cock, R., Denoo, L. & Clarysse, B. Surviving the emotional rollercoaster called entrepreneurship: The role of emotion regulation. J. Bus. Ventur. 35, 105936 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Yu, W. & Patzelt, H. Impulsivity and entrepreneurial action. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 32, 379–403 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D. A., Hunt, R. A. & Dimov, D. Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 33, 52–69 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. A., Lerner, D. A., Johnson, S. L., Badal, S. & Freeman, M. A. Cracks in the wall: Entrepreneurial action theory and the weakening presumption of intended rationality. J. Bus. Ventur. 37, 106190 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. Thinking about cognition and its central role in entrepreneurship: confessions of a ‘reformed’ behaviourist. In Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition 61–85 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014).

  • Zuckerman, M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994).

  • Brown, L., Packard, M. & Bylund, P. Judgment, fast and slow: Toward a judgment view of entrepreneurs’ impulsivity. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 10, e00095 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. (Penguin Books, London, UK, 2011).

  • Gartner, W. B., Teague, B. T., Baker, T. & Wadhwani, R. D. A brief history of the Idea of opportunity. In Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Opportunities (eds Leger-Jarniou, C. & Tegtmeier, S.) 45–67 (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016).

  • Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K. & Vesterlund, L. Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Exp. Econ. 5, 53–84 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palich, L. E. & Bagby, D. R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. J. Bus. Ventur. 10, 425–438 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G. & Gneezy, U. Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 83, 50–58 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halko, M.-L., Kaustia, M. & Alanko, E. The gender effect in risky asset holdings. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 83, 66–81 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. M., Chan, C. C., Leung, A. W., Fox, P. T. & Gao, J. H. Sex-related differences in neural activity during risk taking: an fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1303–1312 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Korucuoglu, O. et al. Adolescent decision-making under risk: neural correlates and sex differences. Cereb. Cortex 30, 2691–2707 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Langowitz, N. & Minniti, M. The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31, 341–364 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. & Eddleston, K. A. Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes?. J. Bus. Ventur. 28, 261–280 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, F. et al. Entrepreneurial neuroanatomy: Exploring gray matter volume in habitual entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 22, e00480 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Exit mobile version