March 30, 2026

Karenmillen Outlet

Solutions for Success

Predicting entrepreneurship from brain structure and neural responses to risk and ambiguity

Predicting entrepreneurship from brain structure and neural responses to risk and ambiguity
  • Van Praag, C. M. & Versloot, P. H. What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Bus. Econ. 29, 351–382 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Holan, P. M. It’s all in your head: Why we need neuroentrepreneurship. J. Manag. Inq. 23, 93–97 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries, definition of entrepreneur in English. Retrieved on 5.12.2023, from https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=entrepreneur.

  • Rauch, A. & Frese, M. Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 16(4), 353–385 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Nicolaou, N., Cherkas, L. & Spector, T. D. Do openness to experience and recognizing opportunities have the same genetic source?. Hum. Resour Manag.: Publ. Cooper. Sch. Bus. Admin. Univ. Michigan Alliance Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag. 49(2), 291–303 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, H. Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Pers. Individ. Differ. 51(3), 222–230 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R. & Xu, T. Personality traits of entrepreneurs: A review of recent literature. Found. Trends Entrep. 14(3), 279–356 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, X. The effect of personality traits on entrepreneurial development in Western China. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 57(5), 1284–1299 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. & Ruef, M. The myth of the risk-tolerant entrepreneur. Strateg. Organ. 2(4), 331–355 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, H. J., Opper, S. & Nee, V. Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: An economic experiment in China. Manag. Sci. 59(7), 1671–1687 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F. M. & Kritikos, A. S. Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs–new evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Bus. Econ. 32, 153–167 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., Herz, H., Nanda, R. & Weber, R. A. Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from behavioral economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 28, 49–70 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R. & Van Praag, M. Risk, uncertainty, and entrepreneurship: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Manag. Sci. 62(10), 2897–2915 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R. & Dalton, M. Risk attitudes and personality traits of entrepreneurs and venture team members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116(36), 17712–17716 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmony, F. U. & Kanbach, D. K. Changes in entrepreneurs’ risk-taking propensity across venture phases. J. Enterp. Cult. 30(01), 1–31 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. Risk, uncertainty and profit. (Hart, Schaffner & Marx, New York, NY, 1921).

  • Ellsberg, D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econ. 75, 643–669. (1961).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. & Brownson, F. What price ambiguity? or the role of ambiguity in decision-making. J. Polit. Econ. 72, 62–73 (1964).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. & Weber, M. W. Recent developments in modelling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 5, 325–370 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W. & Barney, J. B. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Ventur. 12, 9–30 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, H. Y. & Foo, S. L. Moderating effects of tolerance for ambiguity and risktaking propensity on the role conflict-perceived performance relationship: Evidence from Singaporean entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 12, 67–81 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H. Jr., Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C. & Carland, J. W. A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. J. Bus. Ventur. 14, 189–214 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 16, 359–376 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S. & Shepherd, D. A. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31, 132–152 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S. & Sarasvathy, S. D. Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Acad. Manag. Ann. 12, 659–687 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. & Hmieleski, K. M. The conflicting cognitions of corporate entrepreneurs. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31, 103–121 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. P. & Holland, D. V. Environmental effects on the cognitions of corporate and independent entrepreneurs. Small Bus. Econ. 45, 369–381 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A., Clark, L., Labuzetta, J., Sahakian, B. & Vyakarnum, S. The innovative brain. Nature 456, 168–169. (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Laureiro-Martínez, D. et al. Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration-exploitation task. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 927 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vantilborgh, T., Joly, J. & Pepermans, R. Explaining entrepreneurial status and success from personality: an individual-level application of the entrepreneurial orientation framework. Psychol. Belgica 55, 32 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Sun, S., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B. & Yu, R. Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t: Neural processing of risk and ambiguity. Neuroimage 236, 118109 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, S., Drover, W., Cerf, M. & Hmieleski, K. M. Using functional neuroimaging to advance entrepreneurial cognition research. J. Small Bus. Manag. 61, 938–966. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H. & Marschak, J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9, 226–232. (1964).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Konova, A. B., Louie, K. & Glimcher, P. W. The computational form of craving is a selective multiplication of economic value. PNAS 115, 4122–4127 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangemeister, L., Grabenhorst, F. & Schultz, W. Neural activity in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflecting the intention to save reward. Social Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 14, 1255–1261 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R. E. & Laffont, J. J. A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J. Polit. Econ. 87, 719–748 (1979).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. A. & Laury, S. K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 1644–1655 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, T. et al. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 9, 522–550 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R.J. Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B (1984). (University Microfilms No. 84–22112)

  • Williams, D. G. Neuroticism and extraversion in different factors of the affect intensity measure. Pers. Individ. Differ. 10, 1095–1100 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinfurt, K. P., Bryant, F. B. & Yarnold, P. R. The factor structure of the affect intensity measure: In search of a measurement model. J. Res. Pers. 28, 314–331 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. & Bridges, M. W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 1063–1087 (1994).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Voxel-based morphometry—The methods. Neuroimage 11, 805–821 (2000).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38, 95–113 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilaie-Dotan, S. et al. Neuroanatomy predicts individual risk attitudes. J. Neurosci. 34, 12394–12401 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, P. N., Biele, G. & Heekeren, H. R. Neural processing of risk. J. Neurosci. 30, 6613–6619 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, M., Anton, J. L., Valabregue, R., & Poline, J. B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Presented at the 8th International Conferance on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2–6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in NeuroImage, 16(2), abstract 497.

  • Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Turner, R. & Frackowiak, R. S. Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI. Neuroimage 2, 157–165 (1995).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T. & Kable, J. W. The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 76, 412–427 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan Pepe, M. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874. (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, A. & Chernozhukov, V. Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models. Bernoulli 19, 521–547 (2013).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, P. N., Christopoulos, G. I., O’Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J. & Schultz, W. Risk-dependent reward value signal in human prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 7185–7190 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica 60, 497–528 (1998).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W. et al. Explicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertainty. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 363(1511), 3801–3811 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardini, S., Cloninger, C. R. & Venneri, A. Individual differences in personality traits reflect structural variance in specific brain regions. Brain Res. Bull. 79, 265–270 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, R. & Rees, G. The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 12, 231–242 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydogan, G. et al. Genetic underpinnings of risky behaviour relate to altered neuroanatomy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 787–794 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M. & Rodríguez, D. Divergent thinking and post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes: non-linearities and the moderating role of experience. Small Bus. Econ. 62(4), 1523–1553 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morriss, J., Gell, M. & van Reekum, C. M. The uncertain brain: A co-ordinate based meta-analysis of the neural signatures supporting uncertainty during different contexts. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 96, 241–249. (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Teran, E., Diez, I. & Lopez-Pascual, J. An ALE meta-analysis on investment decision-making. Brain Sci. 11, 399 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigue, S., Grafton, S. T. & Bianchi-Demicheli, F. Correlation between insula activation and self-reported quality of orgasm in women. Neuroimage 37, 551–560. (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Häusler, A. N., Kuhnen, C. M., Rudorf, S. & Weber, B. Preferences and beliefs about financial risk taking mediate the association between anterior insula activation and self-reported real-life stock trading. Sci. Rep. 8, 11207. (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, C., Bode, S., Derntl, B. & Heekeren, H. R. The effect of strategies, goals and stimulus material on the neural mechanisms of emotion regulation: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 72, 111–128. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauda, F. et al. Meta-analytic clustering of the insular cortex: characterizing the meta-analytic connectivity of the insula when involved in active tasks. Neuroimage 62, 343–355 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, R., Tolmeijer, E., Wibroe, J., Peters, E. & Mason, L. Networks underpinning emotion: A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity. Neuroimage 243, 118486 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behav. Brain Sci. 35, 121–143. (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslik, E. C., Mueller, V. I., Eickhoff, C. R., Langner, R. & Eickhoff, S. B. Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 48, 22–34 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar-Szakacs, I. & Uddin, L. Q. Anterior insula as a gatekeeper of executive control. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 139, 104736 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, F. et al. Advancing (neuro) entrepreneurship cognition research through resting-state fMRI: A methodological brief. Entrepr. Theory Pract. 48, 719–741 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, T. et al. The role of the ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control. Brain 130, 1525–1537 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dheer, R. J. & Lenartowicz, T. Cognitive flexibility: Impact on entrepreneurial intentions. J. Vocat. Behav. 115, 103339 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamaszek, M. et al. Consensus paper: Cerebellum and emotion. Cerebellum 16, 552–576. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, M. R. et al. A missing link in affect regulation: the cerebellum. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 17, 1068–1081 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. E., Thomasson, M., Voruz, P., Selosse, G. & Péron, J. Explicit and implicit emotion processing in the cerebellum: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Cerebellum 22, 852–864. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmahmann, J. D., Guell, X., Stoodley, C. J. & Halko, M. A. The theory and neuroscience of cerebellar cognition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 337–364 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Hmieleski, K. M. & Henry, R. A. Entrepreneurs’ dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits–and potential costs–of being “up”. J. Bus. Ventur. 27, 310–324 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tata, A., Martinez, D. L., Garcia, D., Oesch, A. & Brusoni, S. The psycholinguistics of entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 7, 38–44 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cock, R., Denoo, L. & Clarysse, B. Surviving the emotional rollercoaster called entrepreneurship: The role of emotion regulation. J. Bus. Ventur. 35, 105936 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Yu, W. & Patzelt, H. Impulsivity and entrepreneurial action. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 32, 379–403 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D. A., Hunt, R. A. & Dimov, D. Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 33, 52–69 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. A., Lerner, D. A., Johnson, S. L., Badal, S. & Freeman, M. A. Cracks in the wall: Entrepreneurial action theory and the weakening presumption of intended rationality. J. Bus. Ventur. 37, 106190 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. Thinking about cognition and its central role in entrepreneurship: confessions of a ‘reformed’ behaviourist. In Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition 61–85 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014).

  • Zuckerman, M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994).

  • Brown, L., Packard, M. & Bylund, P. Judgment, fast and slow: Toward a judgment view of entrepreneurs’ impulsivity. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 10, e00095 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. (Penguin Books, London, UK, 2011).

  • Gartner, W. B., Teague, B. T., Baker, T. & Wadhwani, R. D. A brief history of the Idea of opportunity. In Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Opportunities (eds Leger-Jarniou, C. & Tegtmeier, S.) 45–67 (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016).

  • Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K. & Vesterlund, L. Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Exp. Econ. 5, 53–84 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palich, L. E. & Bagby, D. R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. J. Bus. Ventur. 10, 425–438 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G. & Gneezy, U. Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 83, 50–58 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halko, M.-L., Kaustia, M. & Alanko, E. The gender effect in risky asset holdings. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 83, 66–81 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. M., Chan, C. C., Leung, A. W., Fox, P. T. & Gao, J. H. Sex-related differences in neural activity during risk taking: an fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1303–1312 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Korucuoglu, O. et al. Adolescent decision-making under risk: neural correlates and sex differences. Cereb. Cortex 30, 2691–2707 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Langowitz, N. & Minniti, M. The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31, 341–364 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. & Eddleston, K. A. Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes?. J. Bus. Ventur. 28, 261–280 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, F. et al. Entrepreneurial neuroanatomy: Exploring gray matter volume in habitual entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 22, e00480 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.